Figure 14. Space thermal profile with Conventional Syste
To verify the results as suggested by Pignet and Saxena2 from their case study, Equation 3 was used to solve for the indoor temperature.
tiad=(tahArHah)+tsArHbhAr×(Hah+Hbh)
Equation 3. Vertical profile of indoor air temperature
where,
tiad = Average indoor air temperature (AirBoss) (°F)
tah = Indoor air temperature at roof (°F)
Ar = Roof area (ft2)
Hah = Height above 4-way diffuser to the roof (ft)
ts = Space setpoint (°F)
Hbh = Height below 4-way diffuser to the floor (ft)
76°=(tah×102,300×5)+75×102,300×25102,300×(5+25)
tah=85°
After verifying the results, the heat loss at varying outdoor air conditions can be calculated using Equation 2. For example, the outdoor air temp is 28°, space temperature setpoint is 75°, and the roof heat transfer coefficient is 0.79, the heat loss for each system is calculated below.
qAirBoss=0.079×102,300×(76°-28°)
qAirBoss=387.9 MBh
qConventional=0.079×102,300×(85°-28°)
qConventional=460.6 MB
The heat loss through the roof is reduce by 16% using the AirBoss system. Demonstrating destratification reduces the heat loss, a comparison of the monthly heat load for each system is calculated in Table 10 with the assumptions used in Table 9.
| Average OAT | 28° |
| Occ Setpoint | 75° |
| Unocc Setpoint | 65° |
| Avg # People | 250 |
| # Occ Hours | 16 |
| Days | 31 |
| Therm ($/100 Mbh) | $0.8 |
≤ Previous Page
Page 13